Evidence Hub

Severity-related association between sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal enuresis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sida Shao, Qingli Li, Ce Gao, Guo-Wei Si, Zhao-Kai Zhou, Jia-Yi Wang, Yakai Liu, Zi-Chao Feng et al.

BMC Pediatrics, 2026

40,296 participants

Abstract

This study aims to explore the association between nocturnal enuresis (NE) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) through a meta-analysis and evaluate the impact of different SDB severity levels on the occurrence of NE. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were collected from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, including case-control, cohort, or cross-sectional studies. The search included the keywords, ‘Nocturnal Enuresis’ and ‘Sleep Apnea, Obstructive’, from database inception to 17 May 2024, involving children and adolescents aged 5–18 years with clear diagnoses of NE or SDB. A total of 22 studies (40,296 participants) were included, of which 20 were rated as moderate to high quality. NE patients had a 32.3% (95% CI: 28.3–36.2) SDB prevalence (SWN), while SDB patients had a 24.5% (95% CI: 15.7–33.3) NE prevalence (NWS). The meta-analysis revealed a significant positive NE-SDB association (adjusted OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.35–3.45), indicating SDB is an independent NE risk factor. Subgroup analyses showed that both mild SDB (e.g., habitual snoring) and moderate-to-severe SDB (e.g., OSA) were associated with higher NE risk-mild: OR 2.48 (95% CI 1.68–3.67); moderate-to-severe: OR 2.91 (95% CI 2.20–3.86), but the differences between severity strata were not statistically significant (test for subgroup differences P = 0.758). There is an independent positive association between NE and SDB, indicating a high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 40,296 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free