Evidence Hub

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Heart Failure: Findings From The EMPEROR Program

Pellicori P, Ferreira JP, Butler J, Filippatos G, Cleland JGF, Maffia P, Anker SD, Zannad F et al.

ESC heart failure, 2026

9,706 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a cornerstone of treatment for chronic heart failure (CHF), a condition characterised by systemic inflammation and congestion.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which is thought to reflect both inflammation and congestion, and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with CHF. Additionally, we sought to evaluate the effects of empagliflozin on NLR and across NLR quintiles.

METHODS

For this post-hoc analysis, we used the EMPEROR-Pooled database, which combines the EMPEROR-Reduced (NCT03057977) and EMPEROR-Preserved (NCT03057951) trials, in which 9706 patients with CHF were randomised to empagliflozin or placebo and had NLR available at baseline. The primary outcome was time to first heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular death; secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and renal outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in the lowest NLR quintile, those in the highest quintile were older, more likely to be men, more symptomatic, had higher plasma NT-proBNP and more likely to be treated with loop diuretics. Compared to the lowest NLR quintile, patients in the highest quintile had a greater risk of the primary outcome (14.9% versus 27.3% events; adjusted hazard ratio 1.44 (1.16-1.80); p=0.001), mainly due to more heart failure hospitalisations. Baseline NLR did not modify the effect of empagliflozin on either primary and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 9,706 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free