Evidence Hub

Lifestyle eHealth and mHealth Interventions for Children and Adolescents: Systematic Umbrella Review and Meta–Meta-Analysis

Ben Singh, Mavra Ahmed, A. Staiano, Maria F. Vasiloglou, Claire Gough, Jasmine M. Petersen, Ze-Nong Yin, C. Vandelanotte et al.

Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2025

133,501 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Background eHealth and mobile health (mHealth) interventions are promising in promoting healthy behaviors among children and adolescents. Objective This systematic umbrella review and meta–meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of eHealth and mHealth interventions in promoting healthy behaviors among children and adolescents. Methods Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of eHealth and mHealth interventions targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep, and dietary outcomes in children and adolescents aged below 18 years. Screening, data extraction, and all assessments were completed by 2 reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2) checklist, and meta-analyses were conducted to combine effect sizes using random effects models. Subgroup analyses examined participant and intervention characteristics. Results A total of 25 systematic reviews comprising 440 randomized controlled trials and 133,501 participants, mostly involving healthy children and adolescents (n=18, 72%) or those who were overweight or with obesity (n=4, 16%), were included. Interventions mostly included active video games or serious games (n=8, 32%), various mHealth interventions (n=6, 24%), various eHealth interventions (n=5, 20%), combined eHealth and mHealth interventions (n=4, 16%), wearables (n=1, 4%), and computer-based interventions (n=1, 4%). Most studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 133,501 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free