Evidence Hub

Hyoid Bone Position and Upper Airway Morphology of Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Yaqi Li, T. Zhao, Peter Ngan, Susu Yi, Zeyu Wei, Fang Hua, Hong He

Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2024

11 citations

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to summarise the existing evidence regarding hyoid bone position and upper airway morphology of children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and WorldCat databases without any restrictions on language from inception to March 2024. The studies which compared the hyoid bone position and upper airway morphology using lateral cephalograms between children with and without OSA will be included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale, and the meta‐analysis was conducted utilising random‐effects model. Twelve cross‐sectional studies and one case–control study were included. One study was rated as low quality, three as medium quality, five as high quality, and four as very high quality. Meta‐analysis showed that compared to healthy children, children with OSA tended to have increased distance between hyoid bone and mandibular plane (Hy‐MP, MD: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.90 to 4.77, p < 0.00001, I2 = 72%), increased distance between hyoid bone and cervical vertebra (Hy‐C3, MD: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.46, p = 0.001, I2 = 68%), and a smaller airway space behind the soft palate (U‐MPW, MD: −3.07, 95% CI: −4.76 to −1.38, p = 0.0004, I2 = 68%). Whereas there was no significant difference in inferior posterior airway space between children with OSA and healthy controls (IPAS, MD: −1.51, 95% CI: −3.37 to 0.35, p = 0.11, I2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free