Evidence Hub

Efficacy of myofunctional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Ying Xu, Ruicong Yang, Min Yu, Xue-Mei Gao

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 2025

473 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Myofunctional therapy (MT) has emerged as an adjunct treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the efficacy of MT in treating adult and pediatric OSA.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched until April 30, 2024. Meta-analysis, subgroup, and network meta-analysis using multivariate random effects were performed to estimate pooled differences, focusing on objective and subjective indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs involving 473 adults and 139 children were eligible, with 10 adult studies (n = 380) included in the network meta-analysis. Compared to the controls, MT yielded an improved decrease in Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) of -3.54 (95%CI -5.96 to -1.13, P = .004) and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) of -2.24 (95%CI -3.46 to -1.01, P = .0003), though no statistically significant change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (-8.73/h, 95%CI -21.19 to 3.74/h, P = 0.17). Improvements in arousal index and snoring intensity were also noted in adults. Combining MT with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) could lead to a pronounced reduction in AHI but did not significantly increase CPAP efficacy. Limited evidence suggests MT may benefit AHI and average SpO2 in pediatric OSA, with high compliance being essential.

CONCLUSIONS

The network meta-analysis supports MT as a promising adjunct for improving subjective indicators in adults and suggests that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 473 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free