Evidence Hub

The association of screen time and the risk of sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

He X, Pan B, Ma N, Li D, Kong W, Liu Q, Liu X, Wang X et al.

Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025

548,338 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Screen time has become increasingly prevalent in modern life and may influence various health outcomes, including sleep patterns. Previous meta-analyses examining the relationship between screen time and sleep have been limited by incomplete population coverage and insufficient consideration of potential effect modifiers. To address these gaps, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to investigate the association between screen time and sleep outcomes across diverse populations.

Methods: Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data following a pre-registered protocol. Standardized coefficients (β) and odds ratios (OR) were used to quantify effect sizes. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0, with subgroup analyses performed to explore effect modifiers.

Results: We included 21 cohort studies with 548,338 participants. Each additional hour of daily screen time was associated with approximately 3 to 5 minutes shorter total sleep duration (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.08 to -0.03) in 11 studies reporting continuous outcomes, and with a higher risk of short sleep in nine studies reporting binary outcomes (OR = 1.25, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.40). Subgroup analyses found no significant effect modification by age, region, short sleep definition or follow-up duration (all P interaction > 0.05). However, for binary outcomes, the association between screen time and short sleep differed significantly across countries (P interaction = 0.004).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 548,338 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free