Evidence Hub

Feasibility of Decentralised Response-Guided Albuminuria Monitoring to Optimise Empagliflozin and Finerenone Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

Beernink JM, Laverman GD, Heerspink HJL

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Aims: To assess the feasibility of a decentralised response-guided trial and to characterise urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) responses to empagliflozin and finerenone in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials and methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 25 mL/min/1.73 m2, and UACR > 4.5 mg/mmol (> 40 mg/g) were enrolled in a decentralised response-guided trial. Participants completed study procedures remotely and received empagliflozin 10 mg once daily for 3 weeks. Based on predefined UACR response thresholds during empagliflozin treatment, participants entered a 4-week second treatment phase with continuation of empagliflozin, add-on finerenone or substitution with finerenone. Primary outcomes were feasibility measures, including participant-reported acceptability, sample delivery and completion of home measurements. Exploratory outcomes included changes in UACR.

Results: Eleven participants completed the study (mean [SD] age 69.6 [6.1] years; mean eGFR 61.1 [24.8] mL/min/1.73 m2; median [IQR] UACR 246.9 mg/g [102.8-457.7]). All predefined feasibility criteria were met: urine and capillary blood sample delivery rates were 100% and 98.8%, respectively; home blood pressure and body weight completion rates were 91.3% and 98.6%. During empagliflozin monotherapy, UACR changed by -18.7% overall, after which nine participants (81.8%) initiated empagliflozin-finerenone combination therapy and 2 (18.2%)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free