Evidence Hub

Evaluating the effect of sleep kits and training in foster care clinic visits

Anyigbo C, Fox K, Mara CA, Bemerer J, Krietsch K, Radenhausen M, Patel M, Beal SJ et al.

Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025

177 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This three-arm pragmatic control trial tested the effectiveness of a single-dose evidence-based psychological intervention (EBPI) with and without a sleep kit (treatment arms) to usual care (control arm) among young people (ages 2-20 years) new to a foster care placement.

METHODS: Caregivers and youth were screened for sleep concerns before their foster care clinic visit; if a concern was identified, enrolled young people and caregivers (N = 177) completed sleep assessments before the start of their clinic visit. On days when a psychologist was unavailable to address sleep concerns, participants were enrolled in the control arm. When a psychologist was present, clinic days were randomly assigned to condition (EBPI, EBPI + sleep kit). Participants and clinicians were masked to treatment arm during the clinician portion of their visit. Participants were unmasked at the end of their visit. At follow-up visits, surveys assessing sleep were re-administered. Chart reviews captured documented sleep concerns at clinic visits outside the foster care clinic in the 6 months following intervention.

RESULTS: Compared to controls, those receiving EBPI reported less medicinal sleep aid use (e.g., melatonin) following intervention. Sleep concerns persisted in approximately half of enrolled youth and did not vary by study assignment; sleep outcomes were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS: A single-dose EBPI to address sleep concerns may be effective for reducing use of medicinal sleep aids…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 177 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free