Evidence Hub

The effect of time-of-day on short-term repetitive maximal performance, cognitive ability and psychological variables in adolescents

Hasni R, Ouergui I, Ammar A, Trabelsi K, Ardigò LP, Chtourou H

PloS one, 2025

21 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Previous studies investigating the diurnal variation of physiological and psychological variables during exercise have yielded conflicting results. The present investigation was designed to assess the impact of time-of-day on short-term repetitive maximal performance [i.e., single and two consecutive bouts of 5m shuttle run test (5mSRT), long jump test] as well as cognitive ability and psychological variables [i.e., mood states (POMS) and Hooper questionnaire] in male and female adolescents. In a randomized study design, 21 healthy adolescents (12 females and 9 males; age: 15.9±1.04 years) performed at 08h00 and 16h00 two consecutive 5mSRT (with 20 min of rest interval in-between), to assess the greatest distance (GD), the total distance (TD), the average distance (AD) and the fatigue index (FI), and the long jump test (LJT). Perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded immediately after each 5mSRT. The POMS and Hooper questionnaires and the digit-cancellation test (i.e., attention) were realized during each session. The results showed that TD and AD were greater in the morning than in the afternoon during the 1st (p = 0.048 and 0.048, respectively) and the 2nd (p = 0.0016 and 0.0017, respectively) 5mSRT; while GD was time-of-day independent (p = 0.16). For the FI, results demonstrated a significant time-of-day effect with highest values recorded in the afternoon compared to the morning during the 2nd 5mSRT (p = 0.017). In contrast, attention scores and the long jump test…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free