Evidence Hub

A shared-management web-based intervention for sleep deficiency in school-age children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents: feasibility and acceptability study

Zhai S, Palermo TM, Shenoi S, Demiris G, Howard W, Kientz J, Yuwen W, Ward TM

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Study objectives: We aimed to describe the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a sleep health intervention (SLEEPSMART) for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents.

Methods: Fifty children, 8-13 years of age, with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and sleep deficiency and their parents participated in the study. Participants were randomized to either the SLEEPSMART intervention or the control group (usual care). The SLEEPSMART intervention lasted 7 weeks and included weekly educational modules, quizzes, assignments, goal setting, and an online sleep coach. Children wore actigraphy and completed sleep diaries and surveys at baseline, immediately postintervention, and 1 month postintervention. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of eligible, enrolled, and retained child-parent dyads; engagement was measured when dyads completed the modules; and usefulness and acceptability were measured with the Treatment Evaluation Inventory and qualitative exit interviews.

Results: Of the 50 child-parent dyads enrolled, 88% completed the baseline assessment. Seventy-five percent of children and 89% of parents reported high acceptance; 89% of parents and 80% of children recommend SLEEPSMART. Compared to children in the control group, those who received the SLEEPSMART intervention had significant improvements in actigraphy total sleep time and sleep efficiency and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free