Evidence Hub

Effects of a violet-excitation light-emitting diode on melatonin secretion and sleepiness: preliminary findings from a randomized controlled trial

Mitsui K, Saeki K, Sun M, Yamagami Y, Tai Y, Obayashi K

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2024

16 participants

Abstract

Study objectives: A new type of lighting using violet-excitation light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with an action spectrum centered at approximately 405 nm was developed. Although violet-excitation LEDs can reduce melatonin suppression compared with blue-excitation LEDs, no studies have compared the effects of violet-excitation LEDs with those of blue-excitation LEDs on melatonin suppression. This study was designed to compare the effects of violet-excitation LEDs with those of blue-excitation LEDs on melatonin suppression, psychomotor vigilance, and sleepiness.

Methods: Sixteen healthy Japanese males aged 20-39 years were exposed to violet- and blue-excitation LEDs for 3 hours in a crossover randomized manner. The primary outcome was changes in salivary melatonin levels compared with the baseline levels. The secondary outcomes were changes in psychomotor vigilance and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Melatonin suppression was calculated from the difference in the area under the curves between the baseline and intervention.

Results: Of the 16 participants, 15 completed the measurements. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. After adjusting for age, a difference of 16.28 pg/mL in mean melatonin suppression was observed between the violet- and blue-excitation LED groups (-2.15 pg/mL vs -18.43 pg/mL; P = .006). The overall melatonin suppression by violet-excitation LEDs was 48.6% smaller than that by blue-excitation LEDs. No significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free