Evidence Hub

Effect of diary intervention on sleep quality and risk of stress disorders among critically ill children in pediatric intensive care units and on their parents' anxiety level: A randomized controlled trial

Yingshuang He, Yuhong Zhang, Huining Xin, Jin-Ling Lin, Shuting Lin, Sijia Li, Xiao Cheng, Guihua Liu et al.

Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 2025

47 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate benefits of diary intervention in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) on sleep quality and stress-related disorders in critically ill children and anxiety and depression in their parents.

METHODS

This single-blind, two-arm, randomized controlled trial enrolled 94 dyads. The control group (n = 47) received standard care; the experimental group (n = 47) additionally received a diary intervention. We compared the sleep quality and stress disorders of children, and anxiety, depression, and stress disorders among parents at various time-points, between groups.

RESULTS

Data of 83 dyads were ultimately analyzed (loss-to-visit rate: 11.7 %). During the PICU stay, the experimental group showed significantly shorter total awakening time of each sleep episode and mean duration of each awakening per sleep session than the control group (P = 0.006; P = 0.032). The Childhood Stress Disorder Checklist scores of children in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 1 and 3 months post-discharge (P = 0.003; P = 0.006). Parents in the experimental group reported significantly lower anxiety scores at PICU discharge and 1 month thereafter (P < 0.001; P = 0.015). At discharge, depression scores were significantly lower in the experimental group; this difference remained significant at 1 and 3 months post-discharge (P < 0.001; P < 0.05). At PICU discharge, parental scores were significantly lower in the experimental group than…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 47 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free