Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Melatonin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy in in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Z. Yari, T. Faghihi, Bahram Yarali, F. Kompani, Aalie Safari, L. Koochakzadeh, A. Tavasoli, H. Honarmand et al.

Archives of Neuroscience, 2024

20 participants

Abstract

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in children, accounting for 26% of pediatric blood malignancies. Vincristine is a widely used chemotherapy agent for ALL, but vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is the most prevalent and significant side effect associated with its administration. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin in treating VIPN in children with ALL. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included children aged 5 to 12 years with ALL who were clinically diagnosed with VIPN using the pediatric-modified total neuropathy score. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control or treatment group. The vincristine dose for each of the four treatment phases (induction, consolidation, maintenance, and intensification) was 1.5 mg/m², administered intravenously. Baseline and one-month post-treatment measurements included the CTCAE score (to assess VIPN), PedsQL child and parent scores (to evaluate quality of life), and pediatrics-modified total neuropathy (PEDs MTNs) scores. Patients received either 3 - 5 mg of melatonin or a placebo daily for one month. Results: A total of 20 patients (mean age: 7.45 ± 2.31; 55% female) were included, with 60% allocated to the treatment group. Baseline clinical and demographic data showed no significant differences between groups. The study found that melatonin administration at a dose of 3 mg daily for one month did not significantly improve VIPN in children…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free