Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Assessment of Diastolic Function and Myocardial Strain in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin

Kaya OK, Köker G

Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2026

350 participants

Abstract

Objective: The cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have attracted increasing interest in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to compare the time-dependent effects of empagliflozin and linagliptin on left ventricular diastolic function and global longitudinal strain (GLS).

Methods: This prospective longitudinal study included 350 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with empagliflozin (n = 200) or linagliptin (n = 150). Transthoracic echocardiography and speckle-tracking strain analysis were performed at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months. Diastolic function was evaluated using septal e' velocity, E/e' ratio, isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), and mitral E-wave deceleration time. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models including treatment group, time, and group × time interaction.

Results: Diastolic function parameters improved significantly over time in both groups (all P < .001). At follow-up, HbA1c levels decreased in both groups, with comparable glycemic control achieved at 6 months. Significant group × time interactions were observed for septal e' velocity, E/e' ratio, and IVRT (all P < .001). These findings remained consistent after adjustment for baseline differences. At 6 months, empagliflozin was associated with greater improvement in septal e' velocity and IVRT, whereas linagliptin resulted in a more pronounced reduction in the E/e'…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 350 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free