Evidence Hub

Group bright light therapy compared to treatment as usual for delayed sleep-wake phase disorder among patients in psychiatric care (the SIP trials): a protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

Wilhelmsen-Langeland A, Osnes B, Gradisar M, Vågenes VA, Sørensen L, Bjorvatn B, Fasmer OB, Koenig J et al.

BMJ open, 2025

60 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Circadian rhythm sleep-wake disturbances appear to be prevalent in psychiatric populations and may maintain and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. Bright light therapy (BLT) is, in addition to exogenous melatonin, the treatment of choice for circadian rhythm disorders like delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (DSWPD) and has yielded promising results in patients with comorbid psychiatric illness. However, such patients are rarely offered this treatment in outpatient clinics. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether group BLT for psychiatric outpatients is superior to treatment as usual (TAU).

Methods and analysis: 60 patients with moderate-to-severe psychiatric illness who meet the criteria for DSWPD will be recruited from an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Norway. They will be randomised (1:1) to a group-based Sleep School Wake Up! For Circadian (SSWU-C) programme conjointly with TAU or to TAU while on a wait list for SSWU-C. The SSWU-C will be delivered over four biweekly sessions, each lasting 120 min; hence treatment will last 6 weeks. Assessments will be collected at baseline (T1) and after the intervention (T2). The primary outcome will be changes in sleep timing using measures such as sleep diaries, actigraphy and dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) at 6 weeks postintervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in other sleep metrics, symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, problems with work and social adjustment and well-being.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free