Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular outcomes of empagliflozin-GLP-1RA combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: EMPRISE study

Htoo PT, Cho H, Paik JM, Bykov K, Everett BM, Glynn RJ, Shay C, Schmedt N et al.

Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the cardiovascular benefits of combining empagliflozin with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) is limited, derived primarily from indirect comparisons or subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study emulating two comparative effectiveness trials using US healthcare databases (2013-2022), including federal Medicare and commercial claims data (Optum Clinformatics and MarketScan). Among adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, we compared cardiovascular outcomes in patients initiating: (i) empagliflozin first, followed by augmentation with either GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and (ii) GLP-1RA first, followed by augmentation with either empagliflozin or sulfonylureas. Primary outcomes were modified major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and a composite of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or all-cause mortality. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and rate differences (RD) per 1,000 person-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for over 130 baseline covariates using propensity score matching weights.

RESULTS

Compared with empagliflozin-DPP-4i initiators, empagliflozin-GLP-1RA was associated with lower risk of MACE [HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.97); RD: -3.7 (-7.1, -0.2)] and lower HHF-mortality [HR: 0.61 (0.48, 0.77); RD: -6.6 (-9.3, -3.9)]. Compared with the GLP-1RA-sulfonylurea…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free