Evidence Hub

Relationship between circadian activity rhythms and fatigue in hospitalized children with CNS cancers receiving high-dose chemotherapy

Rogers VE, Zhu S, Mandrell BN, Ancoli-Israel S, Liu L, Hinds PS

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020

24 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Robust circadian rhythms are increasingly recognized as essential to good health. Adult cancer patients with dysregulated circadian activity rhythms (CAR) experience greater fatigue, lower responsiveness to chemotherapy, and shorter time to relapse. There is scant research describing circadian rhythms and associated outcomes in children with cancer. As part of a larger study examining whether a cognitive-behavioral intervention could preserve sleep in children and adolescents with central nervous system cancers hospitalized for high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT), this study aimed to compare CAR of these children to published values and to investigate the relationship between CAR and fatigue.

Methods: Participants aged 4-19 years wore an actigraph throughout their hospitalization (5 days). From activity counts recorded by actigraphy, six CAR variables were calculated: amplitude, 24-h autocorrelation (r24), dichotomy index (I < O), interdaily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), and acrophase. Parent-reported child fatigue and child/adolescent self-reported fatigue measures were collected daily.

Results: Thirty-three participants were included. Three CAR variables (amplitude, r24, and I < O) showed dysregulation compared to published values. Older age was significantly associated with later acrophase and greater dysregulation of all other CAR variables. Controlling for age, more dysregulated amplitude (p = 0.001), r24 (p = 0.003), IS (p = 0.017), and IV (p = 0.001)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free