Evidence Hub

Circadian gene expression in adolescents: Associations with concurrent circadian disruption and subsequent changes in cardiometabolic risk measures

Su D, Goodrich JM, Lee JT, Dolinoy DC, Peterson KE, Chervin RD, Burgess HJ, Téllez-Rojo MM et al.

Sleep medicine, 2026

203 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: Circadian disruption has been linked to adverse metabolic health. Adolescents are particularly susceptible to circadian disruptors, such as delayed sleep onset and social jetlag, which may have sex-specific effects. However, evidence linking these disruptors with circadian gene expression and subsequent cardiometabolic risk remains limited.

Methods: Our study included 203 adolescents (53% females, median age 13.6 years) from the ELEMENT cohort in Mexico City. Sleep was assessed via 7-day wrist actigraphy. A fasting venipuncture blood sample was collected between 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. RNA was isolated from blood leukocytes and sequenced to determine the relative expression of genes. We conducted differential gene expression analysis for 12 core clock genes in relation to sleep midpoint and social jetlag, adjusting for sleep duration and other potential confounders. We further evaluated how circadian gene expression associated with changes in adiposity, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and lipid profiles over two years using linear regression.

Results: Later sleep midpoint (per 1-h increase) was associated with reduced mid-morning expression of four circadian genes: RORA (log2 fold change [LFC]: -0.190; P value: 0.001), RORC (LFC: -0.147; P value: 0.039), CLOCK (LFC: -0.141; P value: 0.019), and NR1D2 (LFC: -0.093; P value: 0.029). Additionally, expression levels of several clock genes (CRY1, NR1D2, BMAL1, and PER1-3) were associated with changes in metabolic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 203 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free