Evidence Hub

Diurnal variations of fever in children: results from an app-based observational study

Beerenbrock Y, Möhler R, Rathjens L, Jenetzky E, Martin DD

BMC pediatrics, 2026

12,454 participants

Abstract

Background: Fever is a frequent concern in early childhood. However, its management remains inconsistent, driven in part by persistent "fever phobia" and heterogeneous advice. Although body temperature follows a well-established circadian rhythm, the diurnal expression of fever in young children is insufficiently described. We aimed to characterise 24-hour patterns of febrile temperatures in children aged 0-7 years using real-world data from a participatory mobile health registry (FeverApp), with specific attention to age and antipyretic use.

Methods: We analysed 28,620 fever episodes recorded in the FeverApp registry between September 2019 and September 2023, comprising 12,454 children (median age 14 months) and 122,890 time-stamped temperature measurements. Mean hourly temperatures were calculated by pooling all eligible entries within hourly bins and were stratified descriptively by age group and recorded antipyretic use, without consideration of dependency. Between-group differences were summarised descriptively using mean differences.

Results: Mean temperature demonstrated a clear diurnal pattern, reaching a nadir at 06:00 (38.25 °C) and a late-evening peak at 23:00 (38.93 °C), corresponding to an observed trough-to-peak difference of 0.68 °C. Infants (< 12 months) showed lower entry-level mean temperatures than older children (1-7 years), with differences smallest around the morning trough and more pronounced later in the day. Recordings close to documented antipyretic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12,454 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free