Evidence Hub

CTNNB1-related disorders: clinical and radiological contributions from a French cohort

Chauvet-Piat E, François-Heude MC, Manes G, Coget A, Leboucq N, Lecardonnel B, Baide-Mairena H, Allais M et al.

Frontiers in neurology, 2026

25 participants

Abstract

CTNNB1 monoallelic pathogenic variants account for up to 4% of genetically determined cerebral palsy cases, yet their phenotypic spectrum remains poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed 25 individuals with pathogenic CTNNB1 variants using medical records and a questionnaire. Data included genetic variants, perinatal history, developmental milestones, behavioral characteristics, head growth, feeding, sleep difficulties, neurological and ophthalmological assessments. Brain MRIs were reviewed by expert neuroradiologists. Twenty-two distinct heterozygous variants were identified. Microcephaly occurred in 16/22 patients. All exhibited global developmental delay, independent walking was achieved at a mean age of 2.1 years, with regression in 4/16 independent walkers. Behavioral disorders were frequent, as were oral sensorimotor disorders (21/25) and sleep disturbances (13/21). Lower limb hypertonia was present in 22/25 patients [spastic (8) and/or dystonic (11)]. Unstable gait were common among ambulatory patients. Exaggerated startle reactions, often since birth, were reported in 16/21. Exudative vitreoretinopathy was identified in 3/5 patients with retinal angiography. Brain MRI (19 patients) showed: thickening of anterior commissure (8), frontal lobe hypoplasia (9), widening of superior vermian sulci (10) and corpus callosum anomalies (7). This study broadens the spectrum of CTNNB1-related syndrome, reporting a complex motor phenotype combining (i) gait disturbances related…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free