Evidence Hub

Sleep behaviors and time-to-pregnancy: results from a Guangzhou City cohort

Zhang Y, Gu D, Xie Y, Li B

Reproductive health, 2025

1,506 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Fertility outcomes are increasingly influenced by modern lifestyle factors, including sleep behaviors. However, the relationship between sleep and time to pregnancy (TTP) is underexplored.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1,684 couples in Guangzhou, China. Sleep behaviors were assessed via structured interviews. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs), adjusting for potential confounders. Sleep-wake regularity was assessed for all women. Among those with regular patterns (n = 1506), we further analyzed sleep duration, bedtime, perceived sleep sufficiency, and insomnia.

Results: Among all participants, 178 (10.6%) had irregular sleep. Time-varying models revealed that compared to regular sleepers, irregular sleepers exhibited a decreasing fecundability ratio (FR < 1) after approximately 2.6 months of attempting pregnancy, with the association becoming statistically significant after 4.1 months. In women with regular sleep, longer sleep duration was associated with higher fecundability (adjusted FR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09-1.27; p < 0.001). Spline analysis indicated a linear increase in fecundability with sleep durations exceeding 7.5 h. Perceived insufficient sleep was linked to reduced fecundability (adjusted FR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.81; p < 0.001), while later bedtime was associated with lower fecundability (adjusted FR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98; p = 0.045). Insomnia showed no significant effect…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,506 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free