Evidence Hub

Screen time and sleep duration in pediatric critical care: Secondary analysis of a pilot observational study

L. Kalvas, Tondi M Harrison

Journal of pediatric nursing, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Quantify and describe screen time (screen type, child engagement, adult co-viewing) in eight critically ill children and determine its association with sleep duration before (parent report) and during (actigraphy) a 24-h period in the PICU. Design and methods: Exploratory secondary analysis of 24-h video and actigraphy recordings in eight children 1–4 years old in the PICU. Videos were coded for screen time using Noldus Observer XT® software. Screen time was compared to American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations (0 h/day < 2 years, ≤1 h/day 2–5 years). Parents completed the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire-Revised-Short Form (BISQ-R-SF) to understand children’s pre-hospital sleep. Actigraphy was used to measure PICU sleep duration. Associations between screen time and sleep were determined with bivariate analyses. Results: Average age was 23.1 months (SD = 9.7). Daily screen time was 10.7 h (SD = 7), ranging from 2.4 to 21.4 h. Children (15.1% of sampling intervals) and adults (16.3%) spent little time actively engaged with screen media. BISQ-R-SF scores ranged from 48.9 to 97.7. Children had an average of 7.9 (SD = 1.2) night shift (19:00–6:59) sleep hours. Screen time was associated with worse pre-hospital sleep quality and duration with large effect sizes (rs= −0.7 to −1) and fewer nighttime sleep hours with a medium effect size (rs= −0.5). Conclusions: All children exceeded screen time recommendations. Screen time was associated with worse pre-hospital sleep…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free