Evidence Hub

How do sleep outcomes differ between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without diabetes? A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Antonio García-Hermoso, Jacinto Muñoz-Pardeza, Jorge Olivares-Arancibía, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Ignacio Hormazábal-Aguayo, Juan Hurtado-Almonácid, Yasmín Ezzatvar

Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2026

Abstract

This study examined differences in sleep duration (primary outcome) and sleep quality (secondary outcomes) between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without diabetes. We searched three databases. Eligible studies included participants aged 3-20 years, with and without type 1 diabetes, reporting total sleep time and/or other sleep parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Seventeen studies were included (956 with type 1 diabetes; 10,893 controls; mean age 12.7 years; 52.6% female). Total sleep time varied by assessment method, but none of the modality-specific pooled estimates were statistically significant. Actigraphy showed no clear difference (Mean Difference [MD] = -7.30 min/night, 95% CI -19.66 to 5.06; I2 = 19.58%); polysomnography suggested shorter sleep in type 1 diabetes with wide confidence intervals (MD = -19.56 min/night, 95% CI -50.39 to 11.26; I2 = 36.06%); questionnaires tended to report shorter self-reported sleep with substantial heterogeneity (MD = -21.03 min/night, 95% CI -46.79 to 4.72; I2 = 86.5%). Sleep efficiency from actigraphy was slightly lower in type 1 diabetes (MD = -0.52%, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.11; I2 = 0.31%). Other polysomnography-derived sleep variables showed no between-group differences. In conclusion, we found no robust and consistent evidence of differences in sleep duration or most objective sleep parameters between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and peers without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free