Evidence Hub

Adenotonsillectomy Reduces Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Improves Sleep Quality in Adult Patients

Julia Toledo, Ana Carolina Ribeiro de Oliveira, Larissa Fontes Germano Santana, S. Gomes da Silva, Fabrízio dos Santos Cardoso

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025

28 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adenotonsillectomy is widely established as a first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children; however, its effectiveness and clinical role in adult patients remain less well defined.

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to measure changes in sleep quality and OSA risk in adults following adenotonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at Unimed, in Itaperuna, RJ, Brazil, including 28 adult patients diagnosed with OSA.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The primary predictor variable was the time point (preoperative vs 2 months postoperative).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The main outcome variable was therapeutic response, measured using sleep quality, OSA risk, and daytime fatigue.

COVARIATES

Age, sex, body mass index, and baseline sleep quality.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using χ2, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon tests (P < .05).

RESULTS

The sample included 28 subjects with a mean age of 28.4 years (±9.1), of whom 15 (53.6%) were male. Adenotonsillectomy improved sleep quality and reduced OSA risk. The proportion of subjects classified as high-risk for OSA decreased from 71.73 to 0% (P < .0001). Median Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores improved from 9.5 (interquartile range 6 to 11) presurgery to 2.0 (1 to 4) postsurgery (P < .0001). In addition, daytime fatigue and snoring frequency also showed marked reductions postoperatively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free