Evidence Hub

Assessing the relationship between smartphone use and sleep in Swiss adolescents: A cohort study

V. J. Waibl, I. Wipf, S. Abend, I. Mootz, H. Jalilian, S. Dongus, M. Guxens, M. Röösli

European Journal of Public Health, 2025

292 participants

Abstract

Abstract Smartphone use is ubiquitous in adolescents’ daily lives and has been linked to poorer mental well-being, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Sleep may serve as a mediator, as sleep deprivation and poor sleep quality are known to affect mental well-being. This study investigates the relationship between smartphone use and sleep among adolescents. Data is drawn from the ongoing HERMES (Health Effects Related to Mobile phone usE in adolescentS) cohort. The study includes 292 Swiss adolescents aged 11-15 years who completed electronic questionnaires on device use (e.g. typical daily screen time, device use before bedtime) and sleep habits (i.e. duration and the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC)). Linear mixed-effects models, clustered by school and adjusted for age, sex, and school level, were used to assess associations. Participants had a mean age of 13.5 years; 54.5% identifying as female. Most (92%) owned a smartphone, reporting an average of 138 minutes of daily screen time. Additionally, 64.7% used electronic devices within three hours of bedtime on four or more days per week. The mean SDSC score for disorders of excessive somnolence was 12.6 (ranging from 0-25). In a preliminary analysis, each additional hour of smartphone screen time was significantly associated with a 6-minute decrease in sleep duration on weekdays (95% CI: -11.8 to -0.26 min) but not on weekends (4.83 min; 95% CI: -12.39 to 2.73 min). Screen time was further associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 292 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free