Evidence Hub

Comparative Cardiorenal Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone, SGLT2 Inhibitors, Semaglutide and Their Combination in Diabetic Kidney Disease

Zhou Z, Fu L, Chen D, Yu P, Xu G, Wu Q, Wu T, Yang P

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

37 participants

Abstract

Aim: To compare the cardiorenal efficacy and safety of finerenone, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), semaglutide and finerenone-SGLT2i combination therapy in diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched through July 9, 2026 for randomized trials involving adults with Type 2 diabetes and DKD. A frequentist network meta-analysis estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiorenal and safety outcomes.

Results: Ten randomized datasets involving 37 923 participants were included. Compared with control, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, finerenone and semaglutide reduced both cardiovascular composite events and composite kidney outcomes; sotagliflozin reduced cardiovascular composite events, and empagliflozin reduced composite kidney outcomes. SGLT2i showed the broadest overall pattern of benefit across cardiorenal outcomes. Dapagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of the composite kidney outcome than semaglutide (RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94), while most other efficacy comparisons between active monotherapies were not statistically significant. Finerenone increased hyperkalaemia (RR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.82-2.26) and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.35). Finerenone plus empagliflozin was associated with a higher risk of hyperkalaemia than empagliflozin alone (RR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.22-5.06).

Conclusions: SGLT2i showed the broadest cardiorenal benefits,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free