Evidence Hub

A school-based health and mindfulness curriculum improves children’s objectively measured sleep: a prospective observational cohort study

Christina F. Chick, Anisha Singh, Lauren A. Anker, C. Buck, M. Kawai, C. Gould, Isabelle Cotto, L. Schneider et al.

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM), 2021

115 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Poor sleep impedes children’s cognitive, emotional, and psychosocial development. Pediatric sleep dysregulation is common, and children who live in communities of low socioeconomic status experience additional risk factors for short sleep duration and poor sleep quality. School-based training in mindfulness and yoga-informed practices can improve children’s behavior and well-being, but effects on objectively measured sleep are unknown. Effects of a school-based health and mindfulness curriculum, which taught practices such as paced breathing, on sleep and stress were examined in 115 children (49 girls, ages 8 to 11 at baseline). Fifty-eight children in a community of low socioeconomic status received the curriculum twice weekly for 2 years. Fifty-seven children in a socioeconomic status–matched community engaged in their usual physical education class instead. In-home ambulatory polysomnography and perceived social stress were measured in all children at 3 time points: at baseline (ie, prior to curriculum exposure) and at 2 yearly follow-ups. Children receiving the curriculum gained an average of 74 minutes of total sleep time, and 24 minutes of rapid eye movement sleep, per night over the 2-year study period. Children not receiving the curriculum experienced a decrease in total sleep time averaging 64 minutes per night, with no changes in rapid eye movement sleep. Sleep improved within the first 3 months of curriculum exposure, in a dose-dependent fashion. Higher curriculum…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 115 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free