Evidence Hub

Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Children with Cerebral Palsy Compared to Non-Neurological Controls: A Prospective Study from a Tertiary Center in Jordan

Montaha M. al-Iede, Abdallah Al-Ani, Amal Abu Libdeh, Amira T. Masri, Ahmad T Qatawneh, Basim Alqutawneh, N. Almasri

Neurology International, 2026

296 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate sleep quality and the prevalence of OSA among children with CP and other neurological conditions using both polysomnography (PSG) and validated sleep questionnaires. Methods: This study was conducted at the sleep laboratory of the Jordan University Hospital (JUH) between October 2023 and April 2025. Patients were consecutively recruited from pediatric neurology clinics. Patients completed a PSG session, while guardians/caregivers completed the pediatric sleep questionnaire (PSQ) and sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC) tools on the behalf of the included patients. The cohort was matched with a control group composed of asthmatic children referred for sleep disturbances. Results: We recruited 296 patients, of whom 41.6% had neurological disorders and 58.4% were matched non-neurological controls. Among those with neurological diseases (n = 123), 46.3% were diagnosed with CP. Patients with CP showed significantly lower sleep efficacy than controls (p < 0.001). They also had reduced total sleep time compared to non-neurological controls but, notably, longer sleep time than children with Down Syndrome (all p < 0.05). Patients with CP had arousal index and apnea–hypopnea index values comparable to controls, but both measures were significantly lower than those observed in children with Down Syndrome and other syndromic patients (all p < 0.05). The risk of OSA according to the PSQ was insignificant for both controls and patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 296 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free