Evidence Hub

A case-control study to investigate the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and the utility of the Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire in children and young people with epilepsy

D. Urquhart, A. Mclellan, L. Hill, E. Carruthers, Elizabeth A. Hill, R. Chin, J. Shetty

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM), 2024

72 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Epilepsy and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) are each relatively common in children. OSAS may affect cognition, such that recognition of OSAS is important for children and young people with epilepsy (CYPWE). Published pilot data reported 55% of CYPWE had symptoms suggestive of OSAS, compared with 7% of typically developing controls. The primary aim of this study was to ascertain OSAS prevalence by polysomnography in CYPWE, with secondary aims being to evaluate the utility of sleep questionnaires in CYPWE. CYPWE and age- and sex-matched typically developing controls were studied. A single night of level I attended polysomnography was undertaken, along with questionnaires (Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the childhood and adolescent Epworth Sleepiness Scale). OSAS was defined as obstructive apnea-hypopnea index of ≥ 1 event/h. Polysomnography was performed in 72 children including 48 CYPWE (60% male) and 24 controls (54% male). Mean age (11 years) was similar for CYPWE and controls (P = .42), with slightly higher body mass index z scores (0.7 vs 0.1, P = .03) noted in CYPWE. Mean obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 0.61 in CYPWE vs 0.42 in controls (P = .62). Despite higher Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire scores in CYPWE (0.38 vs 0.12, P < .001), no difference in OSAS prevalence (10% vs 4%, P = .78) was found. CYPWE had higher childhood and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free