Evidence Hub

The sleep health composite and chronotype among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to case-control peers without diabetes

Necla İpar, P. Boran, H. Barış, M. Us, Burcu Aygün, Belma Haliloglu, Arzu Baygül, G. Mutlu et al.

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM), 2025

84 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Our objectives were to compare sleep health composite dimensions and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to explore the relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D. The study comprised 84 participants with T1D aged between 6 to 18 years and age- and sex-matched controls. The sleep health composite was measured using actigraphy, sleep diaries, and self or parental reports. Sleep disturbance was evaluated using the DSM-5 Level 2 Sleep Disorders Scale Short Form. Chronotype was determined using the Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire. The median total sleep health composite score for both the T1D and control groups was 3.0 (3.0–4.0) (P = .485). Sleep quality was reported as good by 89.3% of participants with T1D and 96.4% of controls (P = .072). Objective data from actigraphy indicated poor sleep quality in 56% of participants with T1D and 59.5% of controls (P = .639). Additionally, 88% of participants with T1D and 84.5% of controls had inadequate total age-appropriate sleep duration (P = .501). Among participants with T1D, those with a stable glycemic variability (coefficient of variation < 36%) had an earlier midpoint sleep (P = .008). Our study indicates that there are no significant differences in the sleep health composite and chronotype between children and adolescents with and without T1D. Although most participants reported good sleep quality, objective assessments indicated poor sleep quality. These findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free