Evidence Hub

Sleep and psychiatric problems in pediatric oncology patients: A case–control study

Seda Şahin, C. Ozdilekcan, H. Hamurcu, S. Ozlugedik, Meriç Kaymak, T. Bayhan, Neriman Sarı, İ. İlhan

Sleep and Breathing, 2026

23 participants

Abstract

This study primarily aimed to investigate sleep habits, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and psychiatric problems in children with cancer compared to a control group (sibling). A secondary objective was to assess the influence of hospitalization and psychological status on sleep-disordered breathing and overall sleep quality. In this prospective case–control study, children aged 8–18 years receiving cancer treatment and their healthy siblings completed validated sleep and psychological questionnaires (PSQI, CSHQ, STAI-C, CDI). Objective assessment of sleep-disordered breathing was performed using home-based peripheral arterial tonometry. Patients were monitored during hospitalization and at home, while controls were assessed at home. Apnea–hypopnea index, respiratory disturbance index, and oxygen desaturation index were analyzed as objective outcomes. Thirty-seven participants were included (23 patients, 14 controls). Disturbed sleep habits were highly prevalent across the cohort (89.2% on CSHQ). Trait anxiety was significantly higher in patients than in siblings. No significant differences were observed between home and hospital measurements among patients. However, compared with controls, patients demonstrated substantially higher AHI, RDI, and ODI values. Subjective sleep quality (PSQI) classified 27% of the cohort as poor sleepers. Pediatric oncology patients experience impaired sleep and increased respiratory disturbances compared with siblings, independent of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free