Evidence Hub

The Joint Association of Sleep Quality and Outdoor Activity with Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shanghai

Ruoyu Lu, Ye Zhang, Yi-Ting Chen, Jiajun Lyu, Rong Li, Wenhui Kang, Anda Zhao, Zidi Ning et al.

Journal of Asthma and Allergy, 2025

16,936 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Purpose Aiming to investigate the combined association of sleep quality and outdoor activity with the risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis in children. Patients and Methods 16,936 children from kindergartens and primary schools in 13 administrative districts of Shanghai, China were involved in the analyses. The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire were respectively used to evaluate the sleep quality, allergic rhinitis and asthma. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the correlation of sleep quality, outdoor activities and their combination with children’s asthma and allergic rhinitis. Results The overall prevalence of asthma and allergic rhinitis in our sampled children were 10.2% and 17.6%, respectively. Poor sleep quality (asthma: aOR, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.73; allergic rhinitis: aOR, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.31) and low outdoor activity (asthma: aOR, 1.30; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.49, allergic rhinitis: aOR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.32) were separately associated with higher risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis, and when the two were superimposed, an additive effect (asthma: aOR, 1.76; 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.39; allergic rhinitis: aOR, 1.46; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.82) was revealed. These associations were independent of sleep duration, but being stronger in sleep sufficiency group. And after stratification by gender, premature birth and family history of allergy, similar…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 16,936 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free