Evidence Hub

Renal functional reserve predicts GFR response to empagliflozin in RENALIS and RACELINES clinical trials

van Baar MJB, Bjornstad P, Touw DJ, Joles JA, Krebber MM, Cherney DZI, van Raalte DH, Muskiet MHA

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2026

71 participants

Abstract

Background: Glomerular hyperfiltration is common in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may reflect reduced nephron number and/or perturbed intrarenal hemodynamics. Renal functional reserve (RFR), the capacity to increase glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with physiological stimuli (e.g. a meal), may help reveal single-nephron hyperfiltration in patients with preserved baseline whole-kidney GFR. We hypothesized that reduced postprandial RFR predicts the acute hemodynamic GFR response in T2D to the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin, but not to the dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin or a sulfonylurea.

Methods: This analysis pooled data from two 8-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group mechanistic trials, encompassing 71 T2D patients with preserved whole-kidney GFR [mean ± standard deviation age 65 ± 7 years, boby mass index 30.4 ± 3.9 kg/m2, glycated hemoglobin A1c 7.8 ± 1.0% (61.6 ± 11.0 mmol/mol), GFR 86.5 ± 17.6 mL/min/1.73 m2]. Patients received empagliflozin (10 mg; N = 20), linagliptin (5 mg; N = 27) or sulfonylurea (glimepiride 1 mg or gliclazide 30 mg; N = 24), in addition to metformin. Measured (m)GFR and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined by inulin/iohexol and para-aminohippurate clearance, respectively, based on timed urine sampling in fasting and post-protein-rich meal conditions. Intrarenal hemodynamics were calculated using Gomez equations; fractional sodium excretion (FENa) and systemic hemodynamics were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free