Evidence Hub

Case study of monozygotic triplets with identical pineal cysts. Is pineal cyst hereditary condition?

Balasubramaniam N, Musil Z, Chroboková K, Tonhajzer M, Moravec T, Netuka D, Beneš V, Májovský M

Acta neurochirurgica, 2026

243 participants

Abstract

Background: Pineal cysts are common incidental findings of uncertain etiology, and the potential contribution of genetic factors to their development remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the possibility of a hereditary predisposition to pineal cysts by examining a unique case of identical pineal cysts in a set of monozygotic triplets and by surveying familial occurrence of pineal cysts within an institutional patient database.

Methods: A retrospective case study was conducted on 21-year-old monozygotic male triplets, each identified with a pineal gland cyst. All three underwent brain MRI with dedicated evaluation of the pineal region, independently reviewed by two board-certified neuroradiologists. One symptomatic triplet (T1) underwent surgical resection; peripheral blood and resected cyst tissue were subjected to whole-exome sequencing using an Agilent/Illumina NextSeq platform with variant analysis against the GRCh38 reference genome. Additionally, an institutional database of 243 patients with pineal cysts was reviewed for familial clustering.

Results: All three triplets presented with morphologically identical 14 mm pineal cysts, despite variable clinical presentations. WES identified a germline HERC2 nonsense variant (c.7114G > T, p.Glu2372Ter) in peripheral blood and a somatic INO80E frameshift mutation (c.42del) in cyst tissue, suggesting a possible two-hit model. Database review revealed eight additional individuals across four unrelated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 243 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free