Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and Types of Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

Muthuka JK, Zimunya R, Simengwa A, Onyango C, Oluoch K, Kioko MT, Mbari DF, Nzioki J et al.

Cureus, 2026

3,008 participants

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall effectiveness of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) interventions and identify sources of heterogeneity using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2004, and April 30, 2025. Primarily, randomized controlled trials with extractable intervention outcomes were included. A total of 41 studies (n = 3,008) were synthesized using random-effects models (restricted maximum-likelihood (REML)), Bayesian hierarchical modeling, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses following PRISMA guidelines. The pooled random-effects estimate showed a significant positive effect of ASD interventions (effect size = 0.506, 95% CI: 0.392-0.619; z = 8.72, p < 0.001), corresponding to an estimated success proportion of 62% (95% CI: 59%-65%). Heterogeneity was substantial (Qₑ (40) = 238.78, p < 0.001; I² = 82.45%; τ² = 0.069, 95% CI: 0.028-0.137; τ = 0.262), with H² = 5.70 and a wide prediction interval (-0.020 to 1.031), indicating strong between-study variability. Bayesian meta-analysis confirmed a comparable effect (posterior mean = 0.619 (62%), 95% CrI: 0.592-0.646), with τ = 0.273 and I² ≈ 82.5%; Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) diagnostics indicated stable convergence (R-hat ≈ 1.00). Publication bias analyses indicated significant funnel plot asymmetry (Egger-type regression: z = 3.429, p < 0.001; weighted…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,008 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free