Evidence Hub

Acceptability and feasibility of a novel postural management night-time intervention to improve respiratory health of children and young people with complex neurodisability (Breathe-Easy): proof of concept study

S. Crombie, D. Sellers, Akshat Kapur, Jessica Baskerville, Stephen Bremner, Christopher Morris

Physiotherapy, 2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Children and young people with complex neurodisability (CYPCN) are at high risk of respiratory illness, frequent hospital admissions and premature death. This study aimed to test the acceptability and feasibility of Breathe-Easy, a novel night-time postural intervention to improve respiratory health in CYPCN.

DESIGN

Case series design incorporating a pre-post interventional study and qualitative study.

SETTING

Intervention conducted at home by parents/carers.

PARTICIPANTS

CYPCN aged 2 to 18 years, dependent on others to move, swallowing difficulties, gastrostomy/jejunostomy, and under care of a respiratory paediatrician.

INTERVENTION

Breathe-Easy protocol included CYPCN lying on a flat bed, three-quarters prone or side-lying using existing night-time positioning equipment. A bile-bag was used to minimise reflux. CYPCN trialled intervention for 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of respiratory health and sleep were collected at baseline, three and six months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents, CYPCN, and healthcare professionals post intervention. Data analysis comprised descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven CYPCN were recruited; eight completed the trial. We interviewed 5 CYPCN, 9 parents, 8 healthcare professionals, 6 carers and one teaching assistant. Positive views were expressed regarding sleep quality, breathing, secretion management and reduced hospitalisation. Overall improvement in respiratory health and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free