Evidence Hub

Clinical and event-based outcomes of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI receiving enzyme replacement therapy in Turkey: a case series

A. Inci, I. Okur, L. Tümer, G. Biberoğlu, Murat Öktem, F. Ezgü

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 2021

14 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to describe clinical manifestations and events of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) VI in Turkey who are treated with galsulfase enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Clinical data of 14 children with MPS VI who were followed up at the Department of Pediatrics of the Gazi University Faculty of Medicine in Ankara, Turkey were retrospectively collected from the patients’ medical records. Patients were selected based on availability of a pre-ERT baseline and follow-up clinical data for a similar period of time (1.9–3.2 years). Event data (occurrence of acute clinical events, onset of chronic events, surgeries) collected during hospital visits and telemedicine were available for up to 10 years after initiation of ERT (2.5–10 years). Results Age at initiation of ERT ranged from 2.8 to 15.8 years (mean age 7.5 years). All patients presented with reduced endurance and skeletal abnormalities (dysostosis multiplex) on radiography. Other common clinical manifestations were cardiac valve disease (N = 13), short stature (N = 11), cranial abnormalities on MRI (N = 10), spinal abnormalities on MRI (N = 7), and mild cognitive impairment (N = 6). School attendance was generally poor, and several patients had urinary incontinence. After 1.9 to 3.2 years of ERT, most patients showed improvements in endurance in the 6-min walk test and 3-min stair climb tests; the frequency of urinary incontinence decreased. ERT did not seem to prevent progression…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free