Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin in nondiabetic individuals with calcium and uric acid kidney stones: a randomized phase 2 trial

Manuel A. Anderegg, Simeon Schietzel, M. Bargagli, L. Bally, Nicolas Faller, Matthias B. Moor, G. Cereghetti, M. Roumet et al.

Nature Medicine, 2025

53 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

Efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for kidney stone prevention in nondiabetic patients is unknown. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, crossover phase 2 trial, 53 adults (≥18 and <75 years) with calcium (n = 28) or uric acid (UA; n = 25) kidney stones (at least one previous kidney stone event) without diabetes (HbA1c < 6.5%, no diabetes treatment) were randomized to once daily empagliflozin 25 mg followed by placebo or reverse (2 weeks per treatment). Randomization and analysis were performed separately for both stone types. Primary analyses were conducted in the per protocol set. Primary outcomes were urine relative supersaturation ratios (RSRs) for calcium oxalate (CaOx), calcium phosphate (CaP) and UA—validated surrogates for stone recurrence. Prespecified RSR reductions (≥15%) were met in both groups of stone formers. In patients with calcium stones, empagliflozin reduced RSR CaP (relative difference to placebo, −36%; 95% confidence interval, −48% to −21%; P < 0.001), but not RSRs CaOx and UA. In patients with UA stones, empagliflozin reduced RSR UA (−30%; 95% confidence interval, −44% to −12%; P = 0.002) but not RSRs CaOx and CaP. No serious or prespecified adverse events occurred. Thus, empagliflozin substantially reduced RSRs in nondiabetic adults with calcium and UA kidney stones. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04911660. As part of the SWEETSTONE trial, the authors report the ability of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free