Evidence Hub

Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Pediatric Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy

U. Khasanov, Zukhrob Sobirjonovich Matmuratov, Alexandru Coman, Andrei Buruiană, D. Passali, Francesco Maria Passali, Ari DeRowe

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026

31 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal tissue ablation technology, offering potential advantages such as reductions in pain, bleeding, and procedural time. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IRE for the treatment of adenotonsillar hypertrophy in pediatric patients. Methods: In this prospective, two-center, interventional case series, we enrolled 31 children aged 3–13 years with adenotonsillar hypertrophy and upper airway obstruction. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. IRE was applied to the tonsils and adenoids using the ENTire™ system. Postoperative pain was recorded daily for seven days using the Parent’s Postoperative Pain Measure. Disease-specific quality of life was assessed at baseline and three months post-procedure using the Obstructive Sleep Apnea questionnaire (OSA-18). Tonsillar size was graded according to the Brodsky Scale. Results: The mean procedure time was 10:40 ± 03:40, and there was no intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. Patients were discharged on the day of the procedure. The postoperative pain on day 1 was ranked as 3.5 ± 1.5 and resolved completely in all patients by day 7. From baseline to 3 months, the mean OSA-18 decreased from 66.4 ± 14.9 to 24.6 ± 9.9 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value of <0.0001), and the Brodsky grade decreased from 3.26 ± 0.63 to 0.92 ± 0.61 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this preliminary cohort, non-thermal adenotonsillar ablation using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free