Evidence Hub

Effects of empagliflozin on functional capacity, LV filling pressure, and cardiac reserves in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized controlled open-label trial

A. Ovchinnikov, A. Potekhina, A. Filatova, O. Svirida, K. Zherebchikova, Fail Ageev, Evgeny Belyavskiy

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

70 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have established the prognostic benefits of sodium‒glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), although the underlying mechanisms are not clearly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on functional capacity, left ventricular (LV) diastolic function/filling pressure, and cardiac reserves in patients with HFpEF and T2DM.

METHODS: In the present prospective single-center trial, we enrolled 70 diabetic patients with stable HF according to the New York Heart Association functional class II-III criteria, an LV ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and increased LV filling pressure at rest and/or during exercise (determined by echocardiography). The patients were randomly assigned in an open-label fashion to the empagliflozin group (10 mg a day, n = 35) or the control group (n = 35) for 6 months. Echocardiography (at rest and during exercise), the 6-min walk test distance (6MWD), blood levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and the profibrotic biomarker sST2 were analysed at baseline and 6 months after randomization. The primary endpoint was the change in the 6MWD, and the secondary endpoints included the change in the left atrial (LA) volume index, early mitral inflow to mitral annulus relaxation velocity (E/e') ratio both at rest and during exercise, key cardiac…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free