Evidence Hub

SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin ameliorates tubulointerstitial fibrosis in DKD by downregulating renal tubular PKM2

Xiang Cai, Huanyi Cao, Meijun Wang, Piaojian Yu, Xiaoqi Liang, Hua Liang, Fen Xu, Mengyin Cai

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2025

22 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objective Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to prevent the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, their impact on renal fibrosis remains largely uninvestigated. This study aimed to explore the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on renal fibrosis in DKD patients and DKD models, and the molecular mechanisms involved. Methods Kidney samples of DKD patients and DKD models were used in this study. DKD mouse models included STZ-treated CD-1 mice and HFD-fed C57BL/6 mice were all treated with empagliflozin for 6 to 12 weeks. Kidney pathological changes were analysed and fibrotic factors were detected. HK-2 cells were treated with normal glucose (NG), high glucose (HG), or HG with empagliflozin. RNA sequencing was employed to identify the differentially expressed genes. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers were detected. Binding of transcription factor and target gene was determined using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. Results Empagliflozin significantly ameliorated kidney fibrosis in DKD patients and DKD models. This was evidenced by tubulointerstitial fibrosis reduction observed through PAS and Masson staining, along with fibrotic factors downregulation. RNA sequencing and the subsequent in vitro and in vivo validation identified PKM2 as the most significantly upregulated glycolytic enzyme in DKD patients and models. Empagliflozin downregulated PKM2 and alleviated EMT and renal fibrosis.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal and cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free