Evidence Hub

Short-term effects of empagliflozin on preventing contrast induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a randomised trial

Zeinab Sadat Hosseini, Mohammad Javad Jamili, Behzad Ensan, Ghazaleh Donyadideh, B. Shahri, H. Eshraghi, S. Darroudi, M. Moohebati

Scientific Reports, 2025

121 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a prevalent cause of hospital-acquired renal impairment in patients undergoing intervention. Limited clinical trials explore SGLT2 inhibitors’ effects on CI-AKI. This study aimed to assess the short-term effect of empagliflozin- an SGLT2 inhibitor- in reducing CI-AKI incidence in PCI patients regardless of diabetes. This research conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial involving 121 patients undergoing PCI referred to Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran from 2022 to 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or a placebo, starting one day before PCI and continuing for two days post-procedure. Renal function parameters such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, cystatin C, and urea were evaluated. After the intervention, empagliflozin users exhibited a significant reduction in mean cystatin C levels compared to the placebo users across all age groups ( 60 years). Patients older than 60 showed significant improvements in mean changes of eGFR with empagliflozin. Patients with eGFR > 60 and 45 60, 45–60, and < 45). There was no significant difference in urea and creatinine levels between the two groups. Empagliflozin notably decreases CI-AKI incidence in PCI patients by improving renal function parameters such as eGFR and cystatin C. These benefits were observed across various age groups, particularly in middle-aged and elderly, and those with varying renal function…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 121 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free