Evidence Hub

A case report of Prader-Willi syndrome in a child with metabolic disorders and severe obstructive sleep apnea treated effectively with continuous positive airway pressure

Jiwei Zhu, Q. Jiao, Yun-Liang Sun, Ruixue Wang, Jianghua Liu, Kai Zhang, Manlu Lu, Lu Liu et al.

Translational Pediatrics, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disorder associated with multiple diseases, including poor growth, genital hypoplasia, short stature, and sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). Sleep-disordered breathing is common in PWS and is often ignored by clinicians. This paper reports a patient with PWS complicated with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Case Description A 13-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital due to ptosis, lethargy, and weight gain. Polysomnography (PSG) showed OSA and severe hypoxemia. Imaging examination showed scoliosis. Laboratory tests suggested that the patient had metabolic dysfunction. Finally, PWS was diagnosed by chromosome karyotype and gene analysis. The patient’s obesity and OSA represented contraindications to growth hormone. After continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, the patient’s sleep apnea symptoms and height were significantly improved, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) index was significantly decreased, peripheral oxygen saturation was increased, and his height increased by 4 cm. At present, the patient has been treated with growth hormone after exclusion of contraindications. Conclusions This case reports a patient with PWS with severe OSA who had improved height after CPAP treatment alone. This patient’s diagnosis had been delayed due to differences in medical education and medical level among the treating physicians. Timely diagnosis and treatment can improve the quality of life of children.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free