Evidence Hub

Randomized Trial of Empagliflozin in Non-Diabetic Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Santos-Gallego CG, Vargas-Delgado AP, Requena-Ibanez JA, Garcia-Ropero A, Mancini D, Pinney S, Macaluso F, Sartori S et al.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020

84 participants · 548 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large clinical trials established the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The early and significant improvement in clinical outcomes is likely explained by effects beyond a reduction in hyperglycemia OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of empagliflozin on LV function and volumes, functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) in non-diabetic HFrEF patients.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, non-diabetic HFrEF patients (n=84) were randomized to empagliflozin or placebo for six months. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricle end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV mass, LVEF, peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-minute walk test, and quality of life RESULTS: Empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction of LVEDV (-25.1±26.0 vs -1.5±25.4mL for empagliflozin vs placebo, respectively, p<0.001) and LVESV (-26.6±20.5 vs -0.5±21.9 mL for empagliflozin vs placebo, p<0.001). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LV mass (-17.8±31.9 vs 4.1±13.4 g, for empagliflozin vs placebo, respectively, p<0.001) and improvements in LVEF (6±4.2 vs -0.1±3.9 p<0.001). Patients who received empagliflozin had significant improvements in peak O2 consumption (1.1±2.6 vs -0.5±1.9mL/min/kg for empagliflozin vs placebo,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free