Evidence Hub

Prolonged-release melatonin in Parkinson's disease patients with a poor sleep quality: A randomized trial

J. H. Ahn, Minkyeong Kim, Suyeon Park, W. Jang, Jinse Park, E. Oh, J. Cho, Ji Sun Kim et al.

Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 2020

18 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged-release melatonin (PRM) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with poor sleep quality.

METHODS

PD patients with a global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score > 5 were included. Patients were assessed using the PSQI, a rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life-39 (PDQ-39), and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III at the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks of treatment with 2 mg of PRM. Partial correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between PSQI score and the other scales.

RESULTS

Thirty-four PD patients with poor sleep quality were enrolled and divided into 2 groups based on medication; PRM (n = 16) and placebo (n = 18). Regarding efficacy, PSQI was significantly improved in the PRM group compared to the control group. Improvement in the NMSS and PDQ-39 summary index were observed in the PRM but not in the placebo group; UPDRS-III score was not significantly changed in either group. PSQI improvement correlated with improvement in NMSS score and PDQ-39 summary index. Regarding safety, all enrolled subjects did not complain of side effects due to PRM.

CONCLUSION

PRM is an effective and safe treatment option for subjective sleep quality in PD patients and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free