Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin and the Risk of Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Helen Tesfaye, Julie M. Paik, Miin Roh, P. Htoo, Heidi Zakoul, N. Schmedt, L. Koeneman, Deborah J. Wexler et al.

JAMA ophthalmology, 2024

8,229 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Importance

Empagliflozin might lower the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by preventing retinal pericyte loss. However, the role of empagliflozin with respect to DR in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear.

Objective

To compare the risk of incident nonproliferative DR (NPDR) and DR progression in patients with T2D initiating empagliflozin vs a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A new-user active-comparator cohort study was conducted using US nationwide insurance claims data from 2 commercial insurers and Medicare from August 2014 to September 2019. Adults with T2D initiating study drugs without prior diagnosis or treatment for proliferative DR or other advanced retinal diseases were included. To assess incident NPDR, patients with a history of NPDR were additionally excluded, while for the DR progression outcome, patients were required to have a history of NPDR. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to May 2024.

Exposures

Initiation of empagliflozin or a DPP4i.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incident NPDR was defined using diagnostic codes for mild, moderate, or severe NPDR. The DR progression outcome was defined as a composite of incident proliferative DR, vitreous hemorrhage, initiation of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, or panretinal photocoagulation. Incidence rates, hazard ratios (HRs), and rate differences (RDs) with 95% CIs were estimated.

Results

A total of 34 239 pairs of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 8,229 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free