Evidence Hub

Dietary exposures and common mental illness in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): a cohort-level GLAD project analysis

Bot M, Penninx BW

medRxiv, 2026

1,634 participants

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression are major contributors to disability. However, the role of diet as a risk factor for anxiety and depression remains underexplored. Therefore, we investigated the associations between food groups and major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders, following a harmonized protocol to enable integration of studies. Methods: We analysed data from 1,634 participants in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety to examine cross-sectional associations between 14 dietary exposures - derived from a 238-item Food Frequency Questionnaire (fruit, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts and seeds, milk, red meat, processed meat, sweet drinks, fibre, calcium, omega-3 fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and trans fats) - and anxiety and depressive disorders in the past month (assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology score [≥]13 vs. <13) and anxiety symptoms (Beck Anxiety Index score [≥]16 vs. <16). Logistic regression analyses were conducted for each dietary exposure, with depression and anxiety measures as outcomes. Results: 8.7% had MDD and 14.4% had an anxiety disorder in the past month. Higher vegetable intake was associated with lower odds of depression and anxiety disorders. Additionally, higher intakes of omega-3 fatty acids, red meat, whole grains, and fibre were associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,634 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free