Evidence Hub

Quantitative relationships between ingested and intestinal flows of linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids, body weight and milk performance in mid-lactation dairy cows

Denis P, Ferlay A, Nozière P, Gerard C, Schmidely P

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2022

Abstract

Linoleic acid (LA) and alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) are essential fatty acids found in variable quantities in ruminant feedstuffs. Revision of French feed unit systems in 2018 has proposed the reassessment of energy requirements through a between-experiment approach expressing metabolisable energy supply as a function of the energy expenditures for maintenance and production, with these expenditures that reflect homeorhetic regulations. Based on the same approach, LA and ALA intake can be related to animal characteristics (i.e., BW) reflecting maintenance expenditures and secretion characteristics (i.e., milk yield, milk fat content and contents of LA and ALA in milk fat). Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyse the between-experiment relationships between ingested, duodenal, or absorbed flows of LA and ALA, BW and milk LA and ALA secretion by meta-analysis in mid-lactation dairy cows. These relationships were analysed using LA and ALA subsets of 96 and 99 experiments, respectively. Between-experiment regressions of daily flows of ingested, duodenal or absorbed LA and ALA on BW and milk LA and ALA flows were studied, with statistical unit defined as the mean of within-experiment treatments. For LA, the BW-associated coefficient was 0.019 (±0.0034) g absorbed LA/d per kg BW and milk LA secretion-associated coefficient was 0.70 (±0.081) g absorbed LA/g of LA secreted into milk. For ALA, the BW-associated coefficient was 0.0058 (±0.00093) g absorbed ALA/d per kg BW…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free