Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of dietary intervention in osteoarthritis management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Asadi S, Grafenauer S, Burley CV, Fitzgerald C, Humburg P, Parmenter BJ

European journal of clinical nutrition, 2025

898 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various dietary interventions on managing osteoarthritis (OA), a condition significantly affecting global health due to joint alterations driven by inflammatory mediators. A systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, examined Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) investigating dietary interventions in OA. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Random effects models calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD). Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB2), and heterogeneity was assessed using I² values. Nine RCTs (898 participants) were identified, assessing various diets: reduced energy (n = 4), Mediterranean (n = 2), low-fat (n = 2), anti-inflammatory (n = 1), low-carbohydrate (n = 1), and plant-based (n = 1). Dietary interventions significantly improved pain (SMD: -0.67; 95% CI: [-1.01, -0.34]; p < 0.0001), and physical function (SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: [-0.94, -0.30]; p = 0.0001) and body weight (MD: -3.18; 95% CI: [-3.52, -2.83], p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed reduced energy diets improved pain (SMD: -0.85; 95% CI: [-1.15, -0.55], p < 0.0001), physical function (SMD: -0.95; 95% CI: [-1.33, -0.58], p < 0.0001) and body weight (MD: -3.13; 95% CI: [-3.77, -2.49], p < 0.0001). The Mediterranean diet did not significantly impact pain (SMD: -0.27; 95% CI: [-1.14, 0.60], P = 0.54), or physical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 898 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free