Evidence Hub

Effect of Different Dietary Patterns on Patients with Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Tavakoly R, Moosburner A, Anheyer D, Cramer H

Nutrients, 2025

952 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of different dietary patterns on depressive disorders. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ProQuest databases were systematically searched until 30 April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different dietary patterns on depressive symptoms in adults with depressive disorders. Secondary outcomes included remission rates, quality of life, and safety. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were aggregated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB)-2 tool, and certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Five RCTs (n = 952) were included, all investigating the Mediterranean diet (MD) in individuals with major depressive disorder or elevated depression levels. The analysis found no significant effect of short-term MD intervention on depression severity compared to active (SMD = -1.25 [95% CI: -5.11 to 2.61]) or passive (SMD = -0.22 [95% CI: -0.74 to 0.29]) controls. There was no effect on quality of life compared to active controls (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI = -3.38 to 4.79]). Intermediate and long-term results were similar. The overall risk of bias was "some concerns", and the certainty of evidence was "very low" for most of the results. Conclusions: The MD appears to have no potential…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 952 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free